Overdiagnosis in mental health is a critical challenge that reshapes how professionals deliver care. According to a pivotal 2019 study in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics by Thombs, Turner, and Shrier, overdiagnosis—correctly diagnosing conditions that yield no treatment benefit—can harm patients and strain healthcare systems. Consequently, this blog explores these findings, providing an engaging guide to redefining mental health care with precision and empathy. Moreover, telehealth and EMDR therapy serve as powerful tools to enhance accessibility and treatment outcomes.
Decoding Overdiagnosis in Mental Health
Overdiagnosis occurs when individuals receive a mental health diagnosis that fails to improve their well-being and may even cause harm. For instance, unlike misdiagnosis, it involves correctly applying diagnostic criteria to mild or transient symptoms that are unlikely to benefit from intervention. The research reveals that only 11.4% of 193 uses of “overdiagnosis” in 164 articles accurately reflect its meaning, while 76.7% confuse it with misdiagnosis. As a result, this misunderstanding drives unnecessary treatments, stigma, and resource waste, highlighting the urgent need for clarity.
Why Overdiagnosis Matters
Overdiagnosis has far-reaching consequences. Specifically, patients risk adverse medication effects, psychological harm from labeling, and financial burdens. For example, the study notes that up to 48% of patients in psychotherapy trials recover without treatment, suggesting many depression diagnoses may be unnecessary. Furthermore, overdiagnosis diverts healthcare resources from those with severe conditions, exacerbating inequities. Therefore, addressing this issue is essential for equitable and effective care.
Tackling Overdiagnosis with Precision
To combat overdiagnosis, bold strategies are necessary. The research advocates revising diagnostic criteria to focus on evidence of treatment benefits, thus avoiding the medicalization of normal experiences like sadness. Additionally, a stepped approach—beginning with active monitoring and minimal interventions—can prevent hasty diagnoses. In this context, telehealth enables remote monitoring, while EMDR therapy provides targeted treatment for trauma, ensuring care aligns with patient needs.
Redefining Diagnosis for Better Outcomes
Current diagnostic thresholds, often set by expert consensus, may contribute to overdiagnosis by including mild symptoms. However, the study calls for evidence-based criteria and enhanced clinician training to distinguish normal fluctuations from pathological conditions. Meanwhile, telehealth improves access to early interventions, and therapies like EMDR offer specialized support. By refining these practices, mental health care can become more precise and impactful.
A Vision for the Future
Looking ahead, quantifying overdiagnosis through research, such as comparing screened and unscreened populations, is crucial. By refining diagnostic practices and embracing technologies like telehealth, the mental health field can deliver equitable care. Similarly, targeted therapies like EMDR ensure resources reach those who need them most. Ultimately, these steps pave the way for a brighter, more effective mental health landscape.
Dr. Sara C is a leading expert in EMDR, CBT, and DBT therapies, offering telehealth services across Newport Beach, CA; Beverly Hills, CA; San Diego, CA; Portland, OR; Jacksonville, OR; Dallas, TX; and Houston, TX. Experience the best in virtual therapy with one of the highest-rated therapists.
In case of a mental health emergency, please call 911 or seek immediate professional help.
Source:
Thombs, B., Turner, K. A., & Shrier, I. (2019). Defining and Evaluating Overdiagnosis in Mental Health: A Meta-Research review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 88(4), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501647
